Talk:White Croats

religious arab sources
any mention of or reference to religious arab sources should be stated as controversial, tentative and unreliable - and the narrative should be framed from the perspective of the indigenous slavs, not the imperialistic and invading (and expelled and unwanted) arabs

i have removed an entire paragraph because it's so biased as to be unsalvageable. it looks like it was written by an imam, and not an academic or a historian.

any mention of or reference to religious arab sources should be stated as controversial, tentative and unreliable - and the narrative should be framed from the perspective of the indigenous slavs, not the imperialistic and invading (and expelled and unwanted) arabs.

there is a serious problem with fundamentalist muslims using wikipedia as a tool of propaganda to distort history for their geopolitical ambitions. i am drawing attention to this, but i cannot fix it by myself, in the presence of overwhelming resources dedicated to the cause.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.190.102.49 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)