Talk:White House Down

Olympus Has Fallen Mockbuster?
Initially I thought it was a D5. The storyline is identical, everything about it is identical, and I know D5 releases quite often have changed names for easier translation where the general gist of the title may be lost in translation otherwise, so I am assuming this is the D5 for Olympus Has Fallen? White House Down / Olympus Has Fallen ... the names are identical too? But I can't find anything online linking the two otherwise, and then when they released the names behind it being entirely different it begs the question; is this an intentional mockbuster to cash in on the hype of Olympus Has Fallen? The level of similarity cannot be coincidence, especially given the schedule of release, etc? BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 13:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Two separate movies, no relation. Just coincidence. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 04:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

A theatrical poster with the cast and crew billing block
If any of you see a theatrical poster with the cast and crew billing block, get it post on here. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You mean like this? All Hallow&#39;s Wraith (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, that would do, I think. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * We need to get a poster with the cast and crew billing on it. Get the picture updated soon. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅ after way too much time.  Corvoe  (speak to me)  16:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Some parallels between White House Down and Breaking Bad
I have found interesting that Killick pretty similar character to Kenny from Breaking Bad, It looks like he even didn't change his clothes after series, and also his CIA case says that Killick right-wing and had some nationalist ideas just like in series. And Martin (James Woods) had the cancer and sort of breaking bad too =) So, I guess, movie-creators definitely use some of the ideas from BB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.80.44.208 (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Introduction needs to be fixed.
It seems someone has wrecked the introduction with names that have nothing to do with the actual article. Revision as of 05:42, 7 December 2013 seems correct, however I am unsure how to revert to that revision EDIT: I managed to revert some of the vandalism, but not all of it. Orcair (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Orcair