Talk:White phosphorus munitions/Archives/2023/May

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2023
I ask that you include a link under external resources to the article covering this topic on legal-tools.org, specifically: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/6acbe4/

The reason is that the external references in the wikipedia article as of now lead to fairly short articles, which also mainly spring out of specific instances of the use of the weapons. The suggested link lead to a much more comprehensive review of the international legal regulations of this type of munition.

Legal-tools.org is also probably the most comprehensive database on international humanitarian law currently available online. Stiannc (talk) 07:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Your last paragraph falls under NPOV issues in terms of sourcing. Callme mirela &#127809; 11:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Citations on legality
the first paragraph under the "regulations" sections state that "incendiary weapons are banned under the Geneva conventions", however the three citations provided doesn't seem to support that. In fact citation [70] says exactly the opposite. Maybe get a better citation or correct that paragraph if it is inaccurate. 2804:431:CFCD:5FA9:C094:7F10:693:2E06 (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I've adjusted the wording accordingly at White phosphorus munitions. Further changes are welcome, if anything. Brandmeistertalk  08:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Phosphorus-nkr.png