Talk:Whitecheek shark

Copyright problem removed
This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

update the range map
I know you didn't make the range map, but I note from the IUCN red list page that the range includes areas around Australia, Indonesia, and the Philippines not in the map we have (though ours dates from a 2005 book). Chris857 (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I had noticed that. I'm not really into making range maps and even if I was, Australia is a big country and I don't expect the shark is found all round its coasts. Anyone amending the range map would need a good map to work from. Is a mostly accurate map better than no map at all, I wonder? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)