Talk:Whitehaven, Cleator and Egremont Railway

Refimprove?
The article had one inline citation 1 January 2015, and now it has 45. Can we remove the refimprove tag?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Res ipse loquitur applies here, so why bother? If the original tagger had any purpose in tagging other than to let others know that the tagger had higher standards than those who had worked on the article, then presumably they patrol articles they have tagged (and come back periodically to see if the article still needs improvement). If not, then why play by their rules? The point of WP (insofar as it has one) is to record information, not to allow people to play at middle management via drive-by tagging to tell others they need to pull their socks up. Rjccumbria (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)