Talk:Whittemore Peterson Institute

Alter and Lo
Alter and LO state themselves that their MLV studiy broadly backs up the WPI study...if this page is going to list with meticulous detail the various negative studies then for balance it needs the Lo Alter study and their quote which states they back up the WPI findings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.145.193 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Controvertial Statements section: Mikovits "defending" use of ARVs more accurate than 'encouraging'
I changed 'encouraging' to 'defending' in the following sentence because the cited article uses the word "defend" not "encourage": "WPI has also generated criticism for statements defending the use of antiretroviral medications as a treatment for CFS.[13]"

Category:Chronic fatigue syndrome
I removed because that category is a subcategory to,  and. An institute is not a disorder, so why did you revert my edit. (Categorization: "When making one category a subcategory of another, ensure that the members of the subcategory really can be expected (with possibly a few exceptions) to belong to the parent also.") Christian75 (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Because WPI is dedicated to research into "CFS". Roxy the dog 10:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)