Talk:Who's That Girl (Madonna song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I was a fan of Madonna in high school (even had a picture in my locker for a spell), but I'll try not to let my bias influence this GAR :) To save us both time, I'll make minor edits as I go along, and bring the other stuff up for discussion here. My wiki-plate is pretty full, so the review may take a few days. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Update: I've done a fairly extensive copyedit of the prose. Review the changes and revert anything you don't agree with, and also check if I've inappropriately altered the meaning. Will be back in a day or two with the actual review (and probably more copyediting). Sasata (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Wonderful! I checked and its fine. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 06:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, have made a few more small tweaks to the article prose. I checked out some of the online sources, and mostly everything checks out. One comment:
 * "It was also featured on the promotional-only instore video compilations It's That Girl and She's Breathless.[24][25]" These citations are to Wikipedia articles, which is to be avoided. Can you find another print or web source that says the same?


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is reasonably well written; article complies with MOS.

Sasata (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Meets GA criteria, article promoted. Sasata (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
 * The citations to online sources I checked were fine. Citations to wiki articles need to be removed or replaced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Coverage is comparable to other similar song articles.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article accurately represents the mixed critical response the song received.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I believe the fair-use rationale to be appropriate for the two images included.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Sorry for the late reply. I replaced that link with that from Andrew Metz's book. It has a list of all the videos and the tracklists. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 04:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)