Talk:Who Can See It/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 19:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Review by Paul MacDermott


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * Article is laid out fairly well and the prose is reasonably well written. At one paragraph the lead is a little short, but it does cover the issues discussed in the main body of the text as a lead should. One small suggestion I have is that although they appear again later, you might want to attribute the quotes to the authors in the lead as well as later. I see some lyrics are quoted, which WP:LYRICS appears to suggest is fine when they're being discussed in the context of the song.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * Lots of references and inline citations throughout to verify the work. No original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * The article is broad in its coverage, discussing the major topics in relevant detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * No issues regarding bias. The article covers the topic in a neutral style.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * Article has one major contributor. No issues regarding edit wars or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * No images at present. While this is not a problem for GA, it would need some images if you plan to take this forward as an FAC nomination. A couple of ideas might be an image of the record sleeve, and perhaps one of Harrison performing the song at a concert somewhere. Also you might like to consider adding an audio sample of the song for those unfamiliar with it.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass A good article into which a lot of work has gone. I would recommend expanding the lead, adding some images and perhaps asking for a copyedit if you want to take this to FAC at some future point, but this is fine for GA. Congratulations. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, Paul MacDermott. I'll definitely take a look again at the lead-in, as you suggest. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)