Talk:Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 02:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

This article will be reviewed within 7 days, and just a note to the nominator, I do my review with a "main list" with the title Review and then separate sections for prose and source reviews. Let's have fun! Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  02:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking this one on; please, take your time as it is a longer article and I have another article being reviewed at the moment. Thanks! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * By the way, I do my reviews in a style with a "main review" then with prose and source separate reviews (if necessary) (Here is a good example.)
 * Usually, I finish in 3-4 days, but I have tommorow off for a school day, so I'll probably get the review done by tommorow. ;) Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  22:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Prose Review
Note: If you correct what I noted, use ✅. However, if you think it can only be somewhat corrected use. Lastly, if it can't be corrected/shouldn't be corrected use. Place 1 out of these 3 after the note. You do not need to respond to comments that say Good.
 * For example: Make the lead shorter. ✅ Done. -sign- OR Partly done. -insert text- OR  Not done. -insert text-

ACTUAL PROSE REVIEW BEGINS HERE
 * Lead: Good. It sums up the article and its length is appropriate.


 * Gameplay Section
 * "The main game is a quiz competition wherein the goal is to correctly answer a series of consecutive multiple-choice questions." Is main needed?
 * ✅ Done. --SethAllen623 (talk) 14:07, October 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * "Contestants were originally faced with fifteen questions of increasing difficulty, but since the format was overhauled in 2010, the contestants are faced with fourteen questions of random difficulty, distributed into two rounds." Maybe say "...however since then the format the format was overhauled in 2010 and the contestants are now faced with only fourteen questions....."
 * ✅ Done. --SethAllen623 (talk) 14:07, October 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * (Payout structure, lifeline, and top prize winners' subsections have no errors)


 * Personnel Section No problems. Good.


 * Production Section No problems. Good.


 * Broadcast History Section No problems. Fantastic! (You really worked hard to fix prose mistakes! I applaud you on your effort!)


 * Special edition Section Dang, no problems. Great!


 * Reception section NO PROBLEMS!


 * Excellent, thank you Seth. I came here to get to fixing these issues as I've been in school all day, but I see I've been beaten to it (which certainly is not a bad thing). Looks like it's ✅! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Great job, Seth and Bentvfan. The article is now passed (officially GA). Congrats! Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  21:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Overall, I commend you and you are a very skillful editor. The article is on hold while I wait for you to fix the errors I stated. (if needed) Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  02:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Source Review

 * No dead refs or disambig links. ✅ Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  21:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)