Talk:Wicked Lester/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria
To uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of September 12, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * One citation needed tag placed in March 2009 remains unaddressed; ref #3 KissFaq is not a reliable source.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A couple of referencing issues need to be addressed. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No attempt has been made to address these points so de listed. Please read the banner at the top of this reassessment to see what to do next. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A couple of referencing issues need to be addressed. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No attempt has been made to address these points so de listed. Please read the banner at the top of this reassessment to see what to do next. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No attempt has been made to address these points so de listed. Please read the banner at the top of this reassessment to see what to do next. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)