Talk:Wieferich prime/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * What does "≡" means? If and only if? And "∤" means "restriction to"?
 * "≡" in the context of this article denotes a congruence on the integers. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * "∤" here means "does not divide" (it is listed at List of mathematical symbols). -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I wikilinked the symbol "∤" to an article where it is explained. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * "log log x" a word too much or intentional?
 * This is intentional. It denotes the logarithm of the logarithm of x. I added parentheses for clarity here. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Similar uncommon units should be linked
 * What in particular do you think should be linked? -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you explain what does the small omega in the second table refers to? If you do this I am happy to pass this article.
 * Explained in this edit. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Red links should be created or explained in the article (for example, I don't know what a "Catalan pseudoprime" is)
 * Redlinks First case of Fermat's last theorem and Catalan pseudoprime eliminated by creating those articles. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Non-english sources should be labelled as such.
 * Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Suggest to remove the red links in the reference section, as it is unlikely they will be created.
 * Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Overall ok
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: On hold to give you time fixing the problems.-- GoP T C N 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Pass
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: On hold to give you time fixing the problems.-- GoP T C N 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Pass
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

(Note): My common practice is to paste the template into the GAN. I often check points 5 and 6 (stability and pictures) before reviewing because they are easy to check. "Neutral" is confusing, as it may also mean that I did not review this points. Ok, now I will resume my review :)-- GoP T C N 11:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)