Talk:Wiesbaden-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 21:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Guess I'll take this one too... Again, review up shortly... Dana boomer (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Lead, "in the shortly before". In the what?
 * Lead, "were built to this class" Is "built to" common vernacular in naval writing? I would think it sounded better as "built in" or "built of".
 * Both fixed - that's the problem with rewriting sentences several times :)
 * Dimensions and machinery, "Marine steam turbines" Is Marine a brand? Otherwise, why is it capitalized?
 * Groner capitalizes it, so I followed that.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Same question - what makes No Limits Diving a reliable source?
 * See my reply at the SMS Wiesbaden GAN page.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A few thoughts on prose and one question on the reliability of a source; other than that, everything looks good. Let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for reviewing these articles. Parsecboy (talk) 03:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. As always, nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)