Talk:Wilco (The Album)

Orphaned references in Wilco's 7th studio album
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Wilco's 7th studio album's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Cohen": From Wilco: Last accessed July 15, 2007. From Kicking Television: Live in Chicago: Last accessed August 27, 2007. From Wilco discography: Last accessed July 8, 2007. From A Ghost Is Born: Last accessed July 27, 2007. 

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Professional Reviews
According to WP:Album guidelines, until other more notable sources post articles (e.g. AMG, Rolling Stone), any website with a volunteer or paid staff of writers can be added to the page. As long as they aren't personal one-man blogs, up to 10 sources may be added (and removed as AMG, RS, etc. begin publishing their reviews). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.225.67.179 (talk) 08:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Is there a reason why the harvard crimson is a part of the album ratings? shouldn't it be removed based on the fact that it is not professional or a music publication?

...and does the user score from metacritic matter at all? I think that even if there were a substantial disparity between the scores, user ratings do not constitute notable reviews. --the authentic david christians (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)