Talk:Wild Boar in Britain

Wrong data
This article, like "Boar" and "Wild Boar" needs cleanup. For example, range map mixes true wild boar and feral pigs.

Merge proposal
I propose that this article be merged into the boar article. Otherwise, we could have a multitude of pages of "Wild Boar in [insert country here]", which seems rather pointless. There's nothing that makes Wild Boar in Britain appear particularly noteable. Indeed, the only page that links here is the Boar article.Lilac Soul 13:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks a sensible idea, as long as we retain the detail from here and make it better referenced. The Boar article is also in need of a good cleanup. --mervyn 07:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Doesn't look like this has enough room to expand beyond stub status, and the boar article could use some beefing up. VanTucky  (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Could someone try and ,erge this article into the Boar article, or perhaps trim it down to become a section of that article. Also, could the Boar article be renamed Wild Boar? Greenfinch100 17:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Out of Date Data
The populations shown at the bottom of this page is way out of date if recent press articles and TV programs are to be believed. A bbc news article put the Kent/sussex population at around 400. I'll try and find aome actual sources but i'm a bit crap at editing.

Also why does the range map not include southern england, if its been establihed that they are back for good? Confusing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)