Talk:Wild Diamond

"Significant copyright violations"
I disagree with the assessment that the plot premise I added constitutes "significant copyright violations". When the film was announced at Cannes, there was only one plotline available. Could I have not as closely translated it? Perhaps. But I believe I took more than enough liberties to deviate from pure copy-and-paste. I reject the claim that this brief 3-sentence blurb which is not a verbatim translation is a significant copyright violation that warrants revision deletions. I would like an admin to review this case before rubber stamping this user's perfunctory request.

Compare the original and translation:

with my revision: Οἶδα (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I think this rebuttal is sufficient to deny the request. It is important to remember that close paraphrasing is not a defense, but a copyvio caused by superficial changes to copied content. That being said, the translation appears to be reasonably rewritten rather than superficially close-paraphrased. At the worst, further discussion would be needed. However the excerpt here does at face value appear to be a reasonable independent rewriting of the source material rather than a vapid copy or close paraphrase. ~Swarm~  {sting} 04:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the response and consideration as always Swarm! Οἶδα (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)