Talk:Wilf K. Backhaus

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because... (your reason here) --Lord Doom (talk) 23:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Wilf Backhaus is the main co author of Chivalry & Sorcery role playing game as Edward Simbalist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_E._Simbalist who has his page on wikipedia I don't understand why Mr Simbalist could have an article on wikipedia and not Mr Backhaus

Userfied
I have a good source for Wilf K. Backhaus. After a request to the closing admin went unanswered, I restored the article and userfied. I will be able to add some sourced content to this article later today. BOZ (talk) 04:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Wilf K. Backhaus → Wilf K. Backhaus – The article was sent to AFD in April 2011 with the only source as his obit at the time, and deleted with only one respondent, who concurred with the nominator. The article was recreated twice by User:Lord Doom, in August 2011 and January 2013, but was speedy deleted both times although the user tried to add a few sources. I restored the article to my user space last month and added two good reliable sources and moved to the new Draft space. I am not certain if it is ready to go back into article space, but I feel it is worth discussing. If any other users can find additional sources to add, that would help with any outstanding notability issues. BOZ (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - passes WP:GNG In ictu oculi (talk) 08:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Always is surprising when people who have no clue what they are doing or what it relates to decide to make decisions that have no place to be made by those without the knowledge. Thank God we aren't stupid enough to let lawyer perform surgery or doctors act as judges. *eye roll* 204.191.183.91 (talk) 00:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)