Talk:Wilfred Bennetto

Untitled
Some unregistered editors wish to describe the subject of this article as "British" rather than "Cornish". Why? Vernon White '''. . . Talk''' 18:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Simple ... he is British! Should you think reference be made to Cornwall then this should ALSO be included. Please remember that readers outside the UK, who make up the bulk of Wikipedia, (i) will not know the finer points of British regions, (ii) want to know facts! And that include him being British. Why do you insist on changing this correct, and more helpful, description? Why not include British? I can not see what wrong with the article included reference to British as well as Cornwall. Is there evidence showing he is not British? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.171.112 (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * On UK articles use the original author's usage unless consensus to change can be reached. Readers outside the UK can always click on a Wikilink if they are unfamiliar woth the descriptor "Cornish> PLEASE sign your posts. DuncanHill (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * But this relates to English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh. There is nothing about the origins from individual counties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.171.112 (talk) 21:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)