Talk:Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sigurd Hring (talk · contribs) 21:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Review
Hi, I'm still fairly new to the site but I'm interested in reviewing and do have some knowledge of this man so I think this will be a good first article for me. I need to study the methodology and its application to other reviews but I'm sure I'll be able to do this fairly soon. Please bear with me for now. Thanks. Ziggy (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and embedded lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):
 * C. No original research:
 * D. No copyright violations:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Scope:
 * B. Length:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

This ticks all the boxes. I think a lot of work would be required before it could be nominated for feature article but for this GA purpose it is fine. One thing that you might consider is the lack of any inter-war coverage but, as the article does point out, he was a career soldier in Bavaria then so not a lot to be said. I see no problems and will pass this. Thanks. Ziggy (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)