Talk:Wilhelm Victor Alfred Tepe

GA nomination
,

I was looking at this article as a possibility to review, but there are issues with the sources. I could do a "quick fail" - but it seems to make more sense to just add some comments here.
 * The first source is a personal site - so it would not pass the reliable sources criteria. See this. The third source is a family history site. Same problem.
 * I don't know at all who the second source is from "pp. 562–563" - so that's a verifiability issue.
 * It would be nice to have links to any of the items in the Important works and captions for Other examples. You can use the ill template where there are not yet English articles, but there are Dutch articles. See (where I went looking for sources - none found)
 * I question He is considered an important and influential representative of Gothic Revival architecture in the Netherlands during the 19th century. because of the lack of reliable sources.

I think you will find that some information will not be able to be included. The place to search includes newspapers, magazines, books first. It looks like he generally used the name Alfred, but I tried some searches just on: Tepe architect

Best of luck on this! Let me know if you have any questions.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * , Wow! You've done some great work on this article. If you're ok with it, I could add links to Important works items where there are articles in Dutch.–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * - Yes, anything you want to do is fine by me. You are an outstanding editor and any edits you do are quality contributions. You have already make some excellent improvements to this article - I appreciate it! My wife is from Groningen.--10:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , I just made some minor tweaks. I wondered if you or a family member were from the Netherlands. Very cool.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
This article is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)