Talk:Will Christopher Baer

Disputing PROD
While I agree that there is a lack of information out there, there is just enough reviews to warrant a "keep" in this instance. Or at the very least, argue that the author is notable enough to where this should probably go through AfD rather than a PROD. He's received a lot of coverage from trades, but there's a few non-trade reviews in there as well. I wouldn't argue against redirecting the Kiss Me, Judas article to the main one for the author, though. That one is just light enough on coverage to where I was hemming and hawing about whether or not to keep that one separate. In any case, the lack of coverage about the author doesn't always mean that the article has to be deleted. If there is coverage of the author's works, which there is, we can argue for his notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Of course, creating an entry for the trilogy of novels that he has released (they're all related to the same character) and redirecting there is also an option. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/41586.Will_Christopher_Baer. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Something also to take into account is that we'd also need something to back this up that isn't a primary source. (Goodreads "about" sections for authors registered on the site are always supplied by the author or their representatives.) We can use it for some small details, but generally we should try to avoid writing an "about" type section using only primary sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   00:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)