Talk:William Arrol

Untitled
Why has the short section with the reference to the Titanic been removed? I have restored the point. in the absence of any explanation. Peterlewis (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I only moved it to the article on the Company on the basis that by 1912 Arrol, aged 73, is unlikely to have been involved in decisions relating to a mere gantry and probably left the matter to Company management. But I really do not have strong views and am quite happy to see it in both articles Dormskirk (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on William Arrol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726175954/http://www.steam.co.nz/hikitia.htm to http://www.steam.co.nz/hikitia.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106235705/http://www.level-two.co.uk/report.php?locname=titan to http://www.level-two.co.uk/report.php?locname=titan
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303174719/http://www.nzrcranes.org/manufact.html to http://www.nzrcranes.org/manufact.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Duplication
There is a separae entry on Sir William Arrol & Co., the same person, with overlapping content. Should they be combined?Bebington (talk) 10:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I would keep them separate: this article is about the person who was also a politician but the other article is about a famous company which continued long after his death. But I agree that overlap should be minimised. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)