Talk:William Attaway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Good article review (see What is a good article? for criteria)

I will continue the review if there is work done to address these above notes. If there is no response, I will fail the article. maclean (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * See WP:LEAD. The lead section should summarize the contents of the entire article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One images used File:William Attaway.jpg claiming fair use. Do you know who the copyright holder is?
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Comments:
 * I understand this is part of a class project: User:Profhanley/teaching/literature of labor.
 * Replace the [clarification needed] tag with more detail
 * Address the refimprove tag at the top of the page by ensuring all sections have citations indicating where the information is coming from.
 * You can properly (and consistently) format the references using the cite templates, like cite journalcite book cite web.
 * Find a more scholarly reference than enotes.com. Where did resources did the enotes editor use to write that article?
 * Conclusion
 * Replace the [clarification needed] tag with more detail
 * Address the refimprove tag at the top of the page by ensuring all sections have citations indicating where the information is coming from.
 * You can properly (and consistently) format the references using the cite templates, like cite journalcite book cite web.
 * Find a more scholarly reference than enotes.com. Where did resources did the enotes editor use to write that article?
 * Conclusion


 * It has been 2 weeks with little done to address the identified issue. I am closing this review now. Due to the above issues the article currently does not meet the GA criteria. maclean (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)