Talk:William Chaney/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. Was the previous review abandoned, or something? In any case, I'm looking forward to this one and hope we can get it done before June so we don't reach that one-year mark! Ganesha811 (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I just noticed you haven't been active on Wiki since February 22nd. Are you still around and available to respond to comments? Let me know - I'm happy to put the nomination on hold for a little while if you are unavailable at the moment. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking on this review,, and sorry for the delay in responding. I've just been busy with work, but should be able to respond in full—although if you wouldn't mind bearing with me a little on timing, that would also be much appreciated. --Usernameunique (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course, no problem. I'll finish up the review and ping you when I'm done. Ganesha811 (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * pinging as promised - only a few issues of detail to sort out and then we're there. I also wanted to mention that this is just a great article in general - a clear portrait of an interesting man. It's nice to see an article on an academic written with such a clear, lively voice. Ganesha811 (talk) 00:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Usernameunique - do you have any availability soon to respond to the remaining comments below? Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay,, and thanks for your patience. I can respond this week if that works. --Usernameunique (talk) 16:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, that will work. I appreciate you letting me know. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up that I know this is still on my plate and I should be back to this in the next 24 hours. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the changes. Any further thoughts on the list of lectures? I still would prefer it was removed, but I know you put a lot of work in there and would like to hear your case again for how a list of his lectures adds value for the reader - what are they expected to get from the information? Ganesha811 (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and removed the list for now, since the nominator appears to be less active on Wikipedia and hasn't edited in a week. If it is later restored, I wouldn't mind, but given no response, have gone with my preference for now. With that, this article passes GA! Congrats to and anyone else who may have worked on it. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)