Talk:William Enyart

Opposition biased posting
I have twice removed a negative post that was reported in newspapers but was highly suspect in its motivation. There is a movement by Gen. Enyart's opposition to muddy his honor and they are using Wikipedia in that effort while their own candidate does not have an open Wikipedia page. While there was an accusation made that was reported in the newspapers, it was made by the opposition and contradicted by eye witnesses. The opposition continues to try to use this alleged incident as political fodder. It is not appropriate in a Wikipedia profile and violates Wikipedia's terms of use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcityeditor (talk • contribs) 18:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. That section won't fly here. It is a blatant WP:BLPCRIME violation. SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 18:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have carefully read WP:BLPCRIME and I do not see a violation. Three different editors have reverted your removal of this material. Should'nt you be trying to persuade us instead of edit warring in slow motion? Lesbianadvocate (talk) 02:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't see it as a violation, you need to work on your reading comprehension. Unless he is convicted of a crime, it doesn't belong in the article. Clear cut. SGMD1 Talk/Contribs 03:04, 6 November 2012 (UTC)