Talk:William Grassie

About this subject
If you need help with it, I may be able to contribute but it will most likely be July or later. At present, the additional material (ie unreferenced, uncited, etc) invites the deletionist types, so I recommend to people working on this article to trim it way down, keeping only that information which is referenced (ie each line should have a reference) otherwise it may attract negative attention. My two cents.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm noticing no trimming. Not a good idea. If people would like to keep this article, cut out all the primary sources, trim it down, way down, or else it will probably get deleted; I've seen it happen; happens in a week if it happens.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Upgrade. Note sources like the "Metanexus Institute" or William Grassie website are not allowed as per WP:RS as it forms a WP:COI and can appear like advertising; not only that, unsourced or improperly sourced content undermines the integrity of the article, giving an air of self-promotion, so that readers coming across this article will not believe it, will doubt its veracity, and have no idea what to make of it. Please stick to valid sources, and only add what they say, as per Wikipedia's guidelines.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)