Talk:William H. Johnson (artist)

GA nomination
i'm going to nominate this for GA, since the revscore indicates it. i trust user:Mary Mark Ockerbloom has it in hand. Duckduckstop (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I haven't actually dealt with a GA before, but if you're willing to lend an eye to the process I'm game to get involved :-) Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've updated the lead to be more comprehensive, and reviewed all the links cited, to ensure that they are current. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Mary Mark Ockerbloom, I thought I should let you know that Duckduckstop has just been blocked as a sockpuppet. If you'd still like to pursue this GA nomination, I'm happy to convert the nomination to be yours (there's a chance the nomination could be reverted otherwise, since edits by sockpuppets are frequently unwound). Just let me know how you'd like to proceed. (Duckduckstop nominated 17 articles in a very short period of time, and all but your two have been reverted or closed.) Don't let yourself be discouraged from pursuing the two nominations you have currently; I don't think you would have needed his help. If you do have any questions about the process, feel free to ask me. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes, please convert these over to me, so that they can hopefully go forward. I'm so sorry to hear that there's an issue. As I noted above, I'm not familiar with the GA process, so any advice going forward would be much appreciated. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, Mary Mark Ockerbloom, this one is done, and I'll be doing the other one shortly. Right now, the reviews are at the "waiting" stage; that section and the next (What to do during a review) explain the next steps in the process, as you wait for a reviewer to select and then start reviewing your nominations against the Good Article criteria. The reviewer will typically list changes that are needed to meet the criteria, and there's back-and-forth as you make edits to improve the article accordingly and/or explain why what they have requested wouldn't accurately reflect the sources and what you propose to do instead. It can be a nicely collaborative process. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)