Talk:William Harper (Rhodesian politician)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll review this over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Cheers, hope you enjoy it. —  Cliftonian   (talk)  18:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Images
 * All look appropriate, the fair use one is legit.


 * Early life
 * "During 1940 he was one of "The Few"—the Allied pilots of the Battle of Britain, in which he flew with No. 17 Squadron and was wounded in action." I know what you're saying here, but it might be more easily understood if broken into two sentences.
 * I've redone this whole bit, hope it's okay now. —  Cliftonian   (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Dominion Party
 * "... the opposition Dominion Party (which called for full "dominion" or Commonwealth realm status)." What was the other party's position?
 * The governing United Federal Party also aspired to Commonwealth realm status, but the Dominion Party were more radical—kind of like the Conservatives and UKIP in today's British politics. —  Cliftonian   (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

That's it. Not much in need of fixing here. I'm looking forward to promoting it. Thanks for writing another good Rhodesia article. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing this and for the kind words. I've replied to each point above. I've expanded the RAF service part quite a bit, maybe have another look to be sure. I'm glad you seem to have enjoyed the article. Cheers, —  Cliftonian   (talk)  18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It all looks good and I'm glad to pass it. --Coemgenus (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, I'm glad you like it. Cheers, —  Cliftonian   (talk)  07:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)