Talk:William Heirens/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:William Heirens.jpg
Image:William Heirens.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Electrical Engineering at University of Chicago
"even as he studied electrical engineering at the University of Chicago"

I do not think this was possible. The first engineering program at Chicago did not occur until just recently (Molecular Engineering - )Bozo859 (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Another point of contention: "Weasel Words"
This article is accused of containing weasel words and phrases ("Some believe..." "Some have said...") I have reread the article and there are very few items that can be construed weasel words and phrases and most of those are backed up by a cite to a link. I don't see how this article can be interpreted as being rife with weasel words. Anyone please point them out. Hunter2005 16:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Why I included the Black Daliah references
It has been proposed by a TV documentary of a possible link between the Black Dahlia case and the Lipstick Murders. the most notable link is the similarities of the dissection of Suzanne Degnan in Chicago and Elizabeth Short in Los Angeles both were dismembered in a way that was quite rare and which would take great skill as purported by the TV documentary "Most Evil" I wonder, did anyone actually read it or did they reflexively just remove it? Can anyone say specifically why this mention should not be included beyond the blanket statement that they are not related? Hunter2005 01:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC) The Dahlia body was also dumped on a street adjacent to Degnan street. I thought that was pretty substantial. -Matio