Talk:William Ketel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Ealdgyth, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Is this review still going on? Just asking since it dosen't seem like this page has been updated. If you would like I can help. — I&#39;ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 &#124;📖📚) 03:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)



Comments

 * Just a suggestion, but it's if possible to source, an image of his works (in the Rolls Series) could be an improvement for the article.

Assessment
 Comprehension:

Verifiability:

Comprehensiveness:

Neutrality:

Stability:

Illustration: Illustrations are not necessary for this short article. 

  '''Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. ''' --Whiteguru (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC) 
 * Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [|Article Talk page]. Review is taken over.

Observations
Document statistics Page Information
 * HTML document size: 51 kB
 * Prose size (including all HTML code): 5318 B
 * References (including all HTML code): 1083 B
 * Wiki text: 5735 B
 * Prose size (text only): 3531 B (593 words) "readable prose size"
 * References (text only): 174 B
 * Page views in the past 30 days = 1,062
 * 90 day page views = 168, daily average = 2 views
 * Date of page creation	= 	11:09, 5 January 2016
 * Date of latest edit = 15:51, 28 May 2022
 * Total number of edits	= 47 by 12 editors
 * Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2016 ...
 * Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted, no vandalism noted. Page considered stable.

Images
 * File:William Kitel - Miracula Sancti Johannis.png = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication
 * Image is tagged and CCbySA remit given; appropriate use with suitable caption
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Short Article and GA Status
 * A short article is regarded as less than 25kb. This article is 51kb (see above)
 * Good Article Talk Archives advise, A good article may be of any length, as long as it properly addresses all major aspects of the topic.


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well scribed. Clear, crisp text.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * References identified as reliable sources.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Well referenced and keeps the focus on the work of Ketel.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV is preserved in this article.

Good Article Criteria

 * 1) The article should be clearly written, in good prose, with correct spelling and grammar.
 * 2) The article should be factually accurate according to reliable sources
 * 3) The article should broadly cover the topic without unnecessary digressions.
 * 4) The article should be stable, with no ongoing edit wars.
 * 5) The article should comply with image use policy.
 * 6) The article is free of obvious copyright violations.


 * There being no failures of the Six Good Article Criteria, the article qualifies as GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)