Talk:William Lilly

Untitled
The mysterious tag that got slapped on this article stating that the contents of this biography (!) did not reflect all "significant VIEWPOINTS" is comical! What facets of the life of a 17th century English occultist and astrologer insults your sense of fair play? Are there crucial facts about this man's life that are not being included? Well, if so, why didn't you use your precious time to *include* them, rather than to put a tag on the article? Is it possible that you can't even imagine what information has been excluded? I'm going to remove this silly tag and request instead that if you have something to say, you come out and say it -- in the article, preferably. This is an expanded blurb which needs more scholarship -- for sure! -- but hardly some sort of manifesto. NaySay (talk) 14:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Developing content
I've made a start on adding references to the text and developing the content, so have moved the 'references-needed' tag to where it applies.Tento2 (talk) 13:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Lilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203015135/http://transact.westminster.gov.uk/greenplaques/displaybyname.cfm to http://transact.westminster.gov.uk/greenplaques/displaybyname.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)