Talk:William Plankinton Mansion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 04:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Commencing review

 * 1) Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
 * 2) Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
 * 3) Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
 * 4) Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
 * 5) ''Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
 * 6) Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
 * 7) Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
 * 8) Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
 * 9) All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
 * 10) All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
 * 11) Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
 * 12) No original research.
 * 13) No copyright violations or plagiarism.
 * 14) Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
 * 15) Neutral.
 * 16) Stable.
 * 17) Illustrated, if possible.
 * 18) Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello,. I'll be reviewing all the Plankinton articles within the current GAN Backlog Drive and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

On hold
More citations are needed in the background section, though some of the existing sources may well provide them. I'm not sure if "Background" is the best heading for that entire section as it is essentially about the construction and usage of the property. One minor point is that City of Milwaukee Historic Preservation Commission is red-linked and this should perhaps be unlinked unless an article will be created in the foreseeable future.
 * ✅ --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

It's a short article but I'm satisfied that its breadth of coverage is satisfactory. It meets most of the criteria already and, if the citations can be completed, I'm confident it will pass. Interesting read, especially as it became a hospital annex for critical cases. On hold for now, but no rush. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Passed
That's fine now,. Am promoting to GA. All the best and keep safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)