Talk:William Rick Singer

Notability
Is he really worthy of his own page at this point?--Fradio71 (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree, not notable.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Also agreed. I've redirected the article per WP:BLP1E. Mz7 (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much!--Fradio71 (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That was a smart way of taking care of this, as it preserves the article in case things get bigger than they are at the moment. Thanks!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Why was the redirect reverted?--Fradio71 (talk) 01:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Not sure, but I've now redirected it per WP:MERGEINIT. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks like it was an accidental self-rollback by . It happens. I added the merge-to and merge-from templates to the respective talk pages just to draw attention to potential relevant content in the history of this page on 2019 college admissions bribery scandal. Should that page also have the blp notice since it will have biographical information about Singer? - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 15:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Oops! It was indeed accidental. My apologies for my fat fingers. I must have accidentally hit the button on my phone. Mz7 (talk) 17:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries at all. It happens all the time unfortunately. In this case nothing of value was lost and it was changed back pretty quickly. Don't give it a second thought.Face-smile.svg - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 17:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Same. My confusion stemmed from the fact that the story had gotten no deeper around him, as such a revert would have implied--Fradio71 (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)