Talk:William Smellie (encyclopedist)

Stretching the bounds of 'relevance'?
"As of 15 October 1968, Smellie was survived by his great-great-grandson Richard Smellie, who in turn had two sons." Surely this kind of information is irrelevant to a biography of the man concerned? DermottBanana (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Be bold and remove it if you feel that it is irrelevant. You don't need permission to make changes here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Prurient?
Should we charact5erise bell's engravings thus? Rich Farmbrough, 15:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC).


 * In principle I don't have a particular problem with it - the fact that they were censored is a pointer, and it suggests why they were censored rather than for conveying military secrets or whatever. In any case the specific word may well be supported by the offline reference. FlagSteward (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Smellie (encyclopedist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004113303/http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf to http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)