Talk:William Sudell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I shall be reviewing this article. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment
 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * Adequately sourced
 * 1) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * WP:NPOV
 * 1) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * no cleanup banners
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * no edit warring
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * n/a

No problems with quickfail crieria, proceeding to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * The article is reasonably well written, I made a few a copy-edits. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * The article conforms with the WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * References support the facts as far as it is possible to ascertain. I assume WP:AGF for print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * All sources conform with WP:RS Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * c (OR):
 * I find no evidence of WP:OR Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * The article is broad in its scope ....
 * b (focused):
 * .... and remains focussed throughout. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Complies with WP:NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * No evidence of edit wars. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * One public domain image is used, correctly tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * A suitable caption is used for the image Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy to pas this as a Good article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy to pas this as a Good article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)