Talk:William de Longchamp/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Decent prose, 7/10


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Minor comments

 * "He was born in Normandy, and some of the later difficulties he had governing England for King Richard I of England may have been due to his differing views of government from the English." - can you be a little clearer? I think you mean that he was raised under a different political system and brought his understanding of politics to Britain, but its not totally clear.
 * "but this is unlikely" - why?
 * "On Richard's accession" - although I know what you mean, perhaps explain this a little more clearly for those unfamiliar with the royal meaning of accession.
 * Northampton Castle, Tickhill Castle and Dover Castle have their own articles, link to them.
 * Decide whether priory should be capitalised or not and be consistant.
 * Capitalise Emperor when referring to a specific one.

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)