Talk:Willie wagtail/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Willie Wagtail/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article is very good. It is very well-written, with good, interesting, and captivating prose, and the lead section is good, short, concise, and summarizing ✅. It is factually accurate, verifiable, and well-referenced with reliable sources ✅. It is sufficiently broad in its topic area, covering the key areas that an article on a biological organism should cover (taxonomy, anatomical description, habitat, range, behavior, human interaction) ✅. Images are marked with appropriate copyright tags ✅ (as a matter of fact, some of the images are of very good quality, such as the image in the infobox, and the Willy Wagtail nest.JPG image ;-). Lastly, it is written from a neutral point of view ✅, and there are no stability issues ✅. So, there you have it. This article meets the six Good Article criteria, and will be listed.

One additional note, I was particularly interested in the 'vocalisation' section, describing the bird songs. I think it might be really interesting if someone could obtain a recording of this bird's songs, and post it as an audio file attached to the article? That would make the article excellent! Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)