Talk:Wilson Bikram Rai

Deleted everything, no sources left
User:Atlantic306 I am sorry I did not realise you were also editing the page. When you said it can't be deleted, I decided to remove crappy stuff instead. I left two reliable sources at first but checking further found that those don't support the article either. So, now there's no sources left but I left the first sentence and filmography anyway despite that.

Anyway, the other page Takme Buda can surely be deleted, as there are no reliable sources covering that subject at all. Can you delete that one? Thanks! MySock1 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive Atlantic306 (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Isn't the point of reliable sources to verify things? Why can't we remove sources that are reliable if they don't verify the claim that it's apparently supporting? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MySock1 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * They should be used to add content not removed. Have you edited with a different username as you seem very cocksure for an editer registered this afternoon? Atlantic306 (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * shit! I just wrote a zillion words about everything and looks like it just got lost. Anyway, tldr; was I have edited some before but this is my first username, maybe I look knowledgeable because I am being guided by a friend who encouraged me to join officially.

But since you called me "cocksure" I am going to leave for you to do with this page what you will and go do something else; I will just have to take my friend's word that you are a good person (I hope you have a good reason for treating me unkindly, cancelling my edits and warning me and threatening to ban me, when I have only been following instructions given at reliable source and verifiability pages) Ciao! MySock1 (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)