Talk:Wimbledon Championships/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Xtzou ( Talk ) 20:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC) This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 6, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
 * Failed "good article" nomination


 * 1. Well written?: Fail. Has clarify and whom tags. There are many short, stubby paragraphs preventing the prose from flowing.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Fail. Much of the article is unreferenced. Many of the references that are there are unformatted, being raw urls.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?:
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images?: Pass

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.

Xtzou ( Talk ) 20:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)