Talk:Windows 7/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Review

 * General
 * Merge very small paragraphs to others.
 * Add sources to many unsourced statements.
 * Features
 * Many references problems. More references are needed for various unsourced statements. 1 example is: "Recommendations for Windows 7 is to be on Windows Vista (Longhorn) before upgrading to any version of Windows 7, and to have 16GB on the hard drive.", etc.
 * Development
 * Windows 7 shouldn't be in italics
 * Reception
 * mostly → generally
 * "The New York Times,[98] USA Today,[99] The Wall Street Journal,[100] and The Telegraph[101] also gave Windows 7 favorable reviews.". Should be expanded upon. What did that say? Think of it?
 * Editions
 * "$" Canadian dollars? U.S. dollars? Which?
 * Clarify that "£" is UK pounds
 * Processor limits is a little small.
 * References
 * TBA. More to come a little bit later.
 * External links
 * Microsoft Windows 7 → Windows 7
 * Categories below should be sorted in alphabetical order

Response

 * Thanks for choosing to review this article. I'd like you to keep me updated - as I'm the nominator - as to its progress. Upon reading the completed review, I will post a full response in this section. --The Historian (talk) 19:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure. The review will be above, in a review section. Cheers! TBrandley 15:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Most issues are now listed above. TBrandley 16:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * In general, it seems like this article doesn't stand on it's own. While there were only very minor changes from Vista to Win 7, the parts of this article covering the functionality, and architecture doesn't seem to cover almost any aspect other than maybe some of the bulletpoints on microsoft's Windows 7 cover page.  What is it's networking like?  It's security?  It's storage?  It's user interface, it's home and corporate networking features, printing, etc.  As it is, it barely seems to cover a microsoft press release on "win 7 selling points".Bstone1 (talk) 10:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * There don't appear to have been any corrective edits in response to the review, and it has been over four weeks. It is probably time to consider closing the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)