Talk:Windsor Link Railway

Fantasy?
Man draws fantasy rail network on cocktail napkin, gets a bit carried away and sets up website and company (how much are those these days, 60 quid?) and proves local press will write about any old nonsense.

Can we delete this vanity tosh? --Dtcdthingy (talk) 14:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Utter pie in the sky nonsense. This is a very biased entry by a fantasist. 86.0.58.10 (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I disagree. It is being taken seriously by Network Rail and the Borough Council. Biscuittin (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Windsor Link Railway, Berkshire → Windsor Link Railway – When this article was first published the Windsor Link Railway was also used to describe the Windsor Link in Manchester. Now that page has been renamed/corrected to Windsor Link Line, there is no longer any need for the disambiguation. In fact, that page should also be shortened as Windsor Link Line, Manchester is also tautological as the Manchester is redundant. Only if they just type Windsor Link should the list of options come up. The name Windsor Link Railway, Berkshire is unnecessarily long because no other Windsor Link Railways exist and should therefore be shortened. Windsor Link Railway is the exclusive description of this page so it is natural that this should be the page name. Bathugeo (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. Zarcadia (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is renamed, then the disambiguation page should move to Windsor Link and the other article, Windsor Link Line, Manchester should move to Windsor Link Line -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support as per Zarcadia. Lamberhurst (talk) 11:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.