Talk:Winged Victory (Lewis)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Okeeffemarc (talk · contribs) 23:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

I will now start to review your article. il report back with my observations in a few days. Okeeffemarc (talk) 01:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Prose is clear and concise, an enjoyable read. whole article complies with WP:MOS. Sources are relevant, accurate and reliable. I went ahead and fixed the single dead link I found. No copyvios or plagiarism. The article is thorough and details similar works to add context, it is matter of factly in style. The article is stable and the images are sound. Really nice work, i will now promote. Congratulations
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Okeeffemarc (talk) 14:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)