Talk:Winnie-the-Pooh (1969 film)

Requested move 9 March 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

– The dash form for the 1969 film is an artefact of romanization and translation and can be dropped, leaving no difference between the 2011 and 1969 films. Further, IMDB calls the 1969 film "Winnie Pooh" reinforcing fact the 1969 film's title is a choice of translations. WP:NCF -- the films should have years added, or instead be called Winnie-the-Pooh (Soviet film) and Winnie the Pooh (U.S. film) respectively. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 06:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Winnie-the-Pooh (film) → Winnie-the-Pooh (1969 film)
 * Winnie the Pooh (film) → Winnie the Pooh (2011 film)
 * Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support, even someone of very little brain could see the logic. GregKaye 08:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support per nom and for obvious reasons.  CookieMonster755  (talk)   00:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Steel1943  (talk) 04:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support; even as the primary author of WP:SMALLDETAILS, these are reeeeeeally WP:SMALLDETAILS. Red Slash 17:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Evaluate an Article Activity
I am curious to learn more about audience reception for the film in the USSR. The article mostly emphasizes the perspectives of the director of the film and his vision for the adapting Milne's work. Apple063 (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)