Talk:Winslade/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bungle (talk · contribs) 16:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Article version being reviewed: 3 January 2017, 12:55 Note: Detailed feedback is below this summary table

Summary/Conclusion
Interesting article that puts alot of focus on its many listed buildings and manor/land ownership, but in my view does this excessively, to the point that the article feels less about the parish itself and more a glorified list of listed buildings and manor ownership. Primary concerns on criteria #3 as noted. I am left wondering what the parish is like in contemporary times (such as what amenities/facilities are available, how it is run, the type of people that live here and how they live their lives). I appreciate it's an article about a very lowly populated civil parish, but at present I don't feel it's broad enough and would benefit from further expansion. Over half the references support information on the many listed buildings, so could be misviewed as being a well referenced article (although in saying that, the referencing is otherwise fine).

I'll give a week from the date of review for improvements to be made and expansion to take place, though if there is clear evidence of improvements once this time lapses or a message showing willingness to improve, then i'll be prepared to extend the time. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I'll get to addressing your concerns at the first opportunity I get tomorrow. JAG  UAR   22:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if I should leave comments in the table as it might break it, so I'll write down what I've done in bullet points:



More to come... JAG UAR   16:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Well done on working through the improvement suggestions swiftly and efficienty. I'll let you find some info on local schools to add in, but otherwise I think after that I can pass it as GA (as I appreciate very small hamlets/villages won't always necessarily have alot going on)! Obviously if you find other relevant info down the line then i'm sure you'd give it a mention. Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * thank you for taking the time to review this, I really appreciate it! Winslade is sort of a special case in the fact that it is a hamlet, but it also has its own civil parish and church. Usually hamlets wouldn't meet the notability criteria for having their own articles, but I was lucky to find enough history and sources on its listed buildings to expand it. This was also my second article I ever created, way back in June 2010. I didn't really think of that until now! Anyway, I've added a bit about its nearest schools (primary school, secondary school, and college). Please let me know if there's anything else you feel is missing. Thanks again! I'll take a look at Binsted's GAN tomorrow morning. JAG  UAR   22:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am happy with the changes that you have made and that it meets the GA criteria and addresses the core parts of my review feedback, so congratulations :) You did well as I managed to make alot of suggestions for an article of a modest size. I have passed as GA. Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)