Talk:Wiradjuri

Changes
I've attempted make some changes in order to ensure the page uses non-racist language, partially capitalization of 'Aboriginal' and have made use of 'Aboriginal people' rather than 'Aborigines'. I also removed the reference to alcohol contributing to the decline in population. Not denying is was a contributing factor, I just want to find a citation before putting it back in. Fizban 14:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Reversions of edits made by 203.54.186.83

 * I have reverted edits made by who was at the time breaching a block.  He has been advised that logging in and editing while blocked is a breach of policy at Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales.  He has definitely seen the advice and is aware of its implications.  As per Blocking policy: Edits made by blocked users while blocked may be reverted. Further commentary about my actions can be made on my talk page or at the Requests for comment/203.54.*.* which I have filed.--A Y Arktos\talk 00:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Name meaning
As inappropriate as the manner in which this anon has contested the meaning of "Wiradjuri" is, I have to agree with him/her that it probably does not mean "people of the three rivers". Most peoples in the area are named after their word for "no" (e.g. Kamilaroi word for "no" is "kamil"). The Wiradjuri word for "no" happens to be wirrai, which confirms my suspicion. --Ptcamn 14:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Ptcamn, what is your ref for: "The Wiradjuri word for "no" happens to be wirrai..."??
 * The spelling wirai is given by --Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The spelling wirai is given by --Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

TY, TY Ptcamm. It seems there is some sense here. I think it was Howitt (or was it Prof Elkin, I'm not sure I have all their publications and papers here but lazy) waxed on re the No thing and justified it, but culturally it means other than that also. Tindale isnt really an authority apart on renaming stuff and recoding stuff, then obscuring it. The stuff he hid isnt too bad re its veracity, but the stuff he published I'd take with a huge grain of salt.

Elkin, Tindale or Howitt werent around 10 kya ago to say "These people are now named the Wiradjuri" so the sound (of the word) origin needs to be traced. I dounbt if Tindale had anything to do with the three rivers thingy. Morelike, Peter Kabiala or someone like that. Have you ever noticed a lot of location name supposedly mean 'quiet place by the river'. That is what gets told to people if they get too nosey and they go publish it. When some go wanting cultural info, they get told something, they go away happy, the real info is protected and all are happy. It works well I think. By the time anyone gets to knowing what words mean from their own cognitive ability, they know to not publish some words, so also join the 'quiet place by a river' brigade.


 * No problem, cite your source. The source, for the present meaning is I think Norman Tindale who is quite possibly mistaken but definitely an authority.  There are no doubt more up to date sources. As of this morning the link to the Tindale page referenced in the article is down.  However, the NSW National Parks and Wildlife service gives Wiradjuri means 'people of the three rivers', these rivers being the Macquarie, Lachlan and Murrumbidgee  and they are citing a printed publication: Heritage Office (HO) and Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (DUAP) 1996. Regional Histories: Regional Histories of New South Wales. Sydney. --A Y Arktos\talk 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I can't find a source specifically saying that Wiradjuri is derived from "no", unfortunately, but this comes close:
 * --Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * --Ptcamn 06:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Wiradjuri Words http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiradjuri-Words.jpg -- RobertM 08:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hooray for Google Books!
 * --Ptcamn 03:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * --Ptcamn 03:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * --Ptcamn 03:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protection
I have semiprotected this articles as per the discussion at Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales:


 * I will similarly semi-protect any related articles if I notice any abusive edits being carried out from the same IP range - abusive edits refers to the tone of the edit summary as well as the actual edit itself.


 * All editors should be aware of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, specifically: No original research, Verifiability, No personal attacks, Civility and Etiquette. Any editors breaching any of the policies will be blocked and their contributions reverted.


 * Recommencing editing in less than the block period is a breach of the Blocking policy.


 * All editors have also been put on notice that comments on talk pages should be signed. Unsigned comments may be reverted.

Any comments about the semiprotection should be directed to the relevant Request for Comment.--A Y Arktos\talk 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Just to clarify, I am reverting comments made by editors who are breaching blocks. The comments are unsigned and could be reverted for that reason alone.  My intentions are set out at Requests for comment/203.54.%2A.%2A--A Y Arktos\talk 02:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Jose
WHO IS ARTHURE JOSE? I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF HIM NOR HEARD HIM MENTIONED AS AN AUTHORITY ON INDIGENOUS LINGUISTICS/ARCHAEOLOGY/ANTHROPOLOGY - OR ANYTHING ELSE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.54.9.25 (talk • contribs).


 * See Jose's ADB entry for those too lazy to do any research. Why should his authority be any less credible than Sir John Heaton (ADB entry), ie Heaton, J.H. 1984, The Bedside Book of Colonial Doings, Angus and Robertson, Sydney, published in 1879 as Australian Dictionary of Dates containing the History of Australasia from 1542 to May, 1879 which the anon keeps citing?  Was  --Golden Wattle  talk 22:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Artkos shows a lack of research skill.

Archaeology is a specialist field so for Jose to be credible, he would need to be an archaeologist and he was not mentioned when I did archaeology at uni, nor is even one of his papers on any of the 9 Australian university databases I have, or have had, access to.

In contrast, to collect a dictionary of dates such as Heaton has authored, is not much different to what happens here. Anyone can do it as Heaton did. However, getting those dates and small snippets of info from credible sources, and correct, is important. Heatons compilation checks with numerous other sources so is a very very very credible one in Australian (heritage, cultural, scientific, literary, etc etc) Studies, (that I am qualifed to comment on).

Dearest artkos, skill teaches 'conceptual analysis' or context.

Lack of academic, interpretive and analytic skill results in content being used inappropriately.

The nonsense caused by dumb ninnys here is annoying.

I checked Jose. Yes, he is a historian.

However, Jose has no archaeology quals and is not Indigenous, so can only comment as a historian which means his comments re archaeological aspects of indigenous culture or cultural aspect, are those of an unqualifed to comment person. Given I have arch quals plus some specialist as well as academic indigenous quals, I am qualified to comment on Jose's lack of quals to comment.

Get it?

Historians just as historians, leave huge gaps in all the other stuff. Bit like getting getting the local welder to do a bone graft.

Yabby, not crayfish
Editors please note: Crayfish are normally found in the sea. The crustacean found in Australian inland waters are know as Yabbies. Please correct this anomaly as it looks silly. Any doubts ask any Australian or contact me at nicko@australiamail.com and delete this when the edit has been done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.148.95 (talk) 06:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I've made the change, as I can't see it making a big difference either way, and yabby is the word we'd normally use around here. (For the record, though, when I searched for definitions of crayfish, the consensus was that crayfish are freshwater crustaceans.)WotherspoonSmith (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Territory
where it says "the change from woodland to open grassland form their eastern boundary", under the territory heading, should this read "western boundary"? or should it read "open grassland to woodland"?

its just that, as its written now, it gives the impression that they lived in woodland, with open grassland to their east. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.127.161 (talk) 13:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * western boundary is closer to Maude than it is to Hay, 'Namcot' is on Wiradjuri land always was always will be 58.6.135.98 (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Notable People
Scanning through the list of names gathered under the heading Notable people, I strongly suspect that a number of the names referenced are not of Wiradjuri descent at all. In an article specifically about the Wiradjuri people, it is inappropriate for non-Wiradjuri identities to be included, regardless of how deserving of mention they might otherwise be. Perhaps someone with sufficient knowledge might vet the list, preferably moving any non-Wiradjuri names to a more appropriate page rather than simply deleting them. Peter B. (talk) 04:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

I have removed Bill Onus, who is listed as Yorta Yorta in all the references I can find. WotherspoonSmith (talk) 00:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Infobox necessary?
As per WP:Disinfoboxes, I find this article to not need an infobox, as it adds no real value to the article and just draws attention away from the actual article. Therefore, I propose to remove this infobox. Even so, if you do want to use an infobox, wouldn't it make more sense to use Template:Infobox ethnic group instead of using the generic template? C1MM (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Fix, please./
' H writes that there was such a "literary need for major groupings that [Fraser] set out to provide them for New South Wales, coining entirely artificial terms for his 'Great tribes'. These were not based on field research and lacked aboriginal support.'

This par needs to be fixed. Repetitious and incomplete. Who is H?2001:44B8:3102:BB00:11AA:A5C7:7019:3816 (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * has fixed this (thanks!) - but do feel free to edit articles yourself, IP person. I have added a Welcome panel to your user page to help get you started. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

They "survive" as "hunter gatherers".
The present tense of the word "survive" in the opening paragraph implies that they are currently surviving from hunter-gather activities. That's plainly absurd. Australia has a modern economy, globally low unemployment, minimum wages that are about average for OECD members (wealthy countries), and a social welfare system that provides a level of support to the disabled, the elderly, students, and the unemployed, including the long-term unemployed that's about average for OECD members. Few if any people in Australia, Wiradjuri or otherwise would currently survive by hunter-gather activities. MathewMunro (talk) 14:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, we shouldn't anticipate our collective future. That patch of prose was a meme plunked around several pages. The intention was fine: bush lore was handed down, and descendants still access it in foraging for traditional foods to supplement their diet or because it is good costless tucker. I've modified the pastiche to make it reflect modern realities.Nishidani (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

An ethnicity named "no"?
Just a simple question... WHY does this tribe of aborigines name itself as a negative? I don't know of any other tribe in the whole world that has a negativ word as its own etymologic name, but the Wiradjuri call themselves "not having"? Most tribes use some positive word as their own name or at least a common generic name such as "the people", but as far as I understand the article Wiradjuris actually say "don't have" if they refer to themselves. Why?--95.91.229.70 (talk) 00:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This is explained in the article - the group was distinguished from others by a single word that was different from neighbouring Aboriginal peoples, and as it says there, this was not unique; other groups in NSW were also named after their distinctive words for "no". It was simply a way of distinguishing them from other peoples with other languages, a convention. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)