Talk:Wirgman Building/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 09:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I'll take this review. I'll note at the outset I've had no role in editing or creating this article. I welcome other editors at any stage to contribute to this review. I will spend a day familiarising myself with the article and then provide an assessment. Kind regards, LT910001 (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for waiting. In conducting this review, I will:
 * Provide an assessment using WP:GARC
 * If this article does not meet the criteria, explain what areas need improvement.
 * Provide possible solutions that may (or may not) be used to fix these.

Commentary
This is a wonderful, well-written, and well-sourced article that presents a thorough history of the Wirgman building. This article is one of few that, off the bat, passes the review. I thank the nominator and any other editors for their contributions to this article, and wish them and their families well during this 2013 festive season. I have made the changes required for GA promotion. Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * LT910001, thank you again for your thoughtful review of Wirgman Building, and for finding it worthy enough of Good Article status! I wish you a merry holiday season in return, and I look forward to working with you again in the near future! -- Caponer (talk) 04:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC)