Talk:With the Old Breed/Archive 1

New printing
Now that there's a 2007 printing, it might be useful to update this entry. --Habap 21:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Added more information
I added Sledge's Company information and Oxford as the publisher. I may start working on a getting a cover scanned and put on the page.

This.machinery 15:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Just added an infobox trying to figure out how to upload an image.

This.machinery 01:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Undue weight seen in discussion of mutilation incident
I'm thinking seriously about deleting this incident as is presently written in the article. I found that the article discussion about mutilation of war dead has three problems. First it is unreferenced. Second, as a tiny snippet from minor, even trivial bit of the story, it shows undue weight. Third, it creates a slanted point of view about the book since it entirely neglects both Sledge's introspection and his discussion with an officer about moral implications of mutilation of the dead. Sledge's book is a very deep but often understated introspective about young men just out of childhood being trapped in warfare, not a shoot-em-up. So the article doesn't need to read like a gee-whiz teaser for a movie. Other opinions?Trilobitealive (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Seems fine the way it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.56.102.101 (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tell me more please, User:166.56.102.101. How does it improve the article while remaining in accordance with the principles of WP:DUE? Trilobitealive (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)