Talk:Wizards & Warriors/Archive 1

Kuros

 * Kuros is on AFD. Kappa 22:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wizardsandwarriors.jpg
Image:Wizardsandwarriors.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Video games assessment
Overall the prose of the article is pretty strong. The image could use a left-justify per WP:MOSIMAGES which states images should alternate left/right when possible. What kills B-class are the external links. Why are three reviews there? Anyway, It's definitely a nice read. I remember this game from back in the day. It's nice to see it get some recognition today. --Teancum (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The links there are from sites are not necessarily considered reliable to use as references but can provide some extra information about the game, which I thought would be acceptable under WP:ELMAYBE. Otherwise, I can remove them. –MuZemike 21:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough - promoted to B --Teancum (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Gameplay section is like a game guide
I will be deleting much info from the Gameplay section. WP:NOT, WP:NOT, and scope guidelines all pretty much agree with me. Item info such as keys, what potions do etc. are not within Wikipedia's scope and are game guide material. Cheers. Ong elvin 10:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The descriptions for Cloak of Darkness and Boots of Lavawalk in the Gameplay section are completely inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.213.128.251 (talk) 22:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

"Humorously?"
The "funniness" of something is subjective, therefore should not be used as an adjective in an encyclopedic article, "writer Seanbaby humorously criticized the game." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.129.200.89 (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)