Talk:Wodzianka

Redirect?
Needs redirecting to wikitionary (or whatever it is called) or substantial expansion if actually notable). I don't know how to do redirects myself. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, this is stub - to extending. This is not artitle in dictionary (wikitionary). LUCPOL (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * If the only content of the article is a definition (which this is) than it belongs in the wikitionary. Even a stub article should have more than a single line. If you know more about the subject than please go ahead and expand the article to more than just this definition. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I in future will extend article. LUCPOL (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Would you like me to place the appropriate tag on the article for you to reflect that you are working on it? You will need to make regular edits to the page over the next few hours and days to reflect that it is in use. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I in future will extend article. I have not time now and tommorow. Maybe in month. Give already calmness. EOT. LUCPOL (talk) 13:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As you are the only contributor and won't be able to work on the article I am going to suggest it's deletion. As you have plans to expand it eventually replacing the one line that currently exists will be easy enough. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Jasynnash2, I'm afraid you don't understand quite how Wikipedia works. There is no deadline for edits to Wikipedia.  It's perfectly legitimate for an article to exist as a simple stub for ages, only to be improved by some other independant editor.  The fact that nobody is working on it is not a reason for deletion; look at WP:NOEFFORT.  The idea that Wikipedia is not a dictionary refers to topics where there is little more potential for content beyond the definition of the word.  Something like this, which is a regional dish, can potentially have information on it's history, variations, cultural signifigance and other things that extend beyond the scope of a dictionary entry.  The fact that such information merely hasn't yet been added to the article does not mean the entire article should be scrapped. -Verdatum (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The "deadline" you speak of are the underconstruction & inuse tags which both reference time frames for the editing (one so many hours and the other so many days). Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see, you wanted to delete the article independantly of the tag, and you were just making sure it wasn't actively being revamped. All is well. -Verdatum (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)