Talk:Woffles Wu

Overly detailed coverage of the case
The article currently devotes too much to the case. On one hand one might as well make it an article about the case rather than the subject, on the other extreme it is practically a COATRACK. Part of this is due to repeated inclusions of the same points (i.e. different parties referencing the online unsatisfaction when it can be grouped together). Plus its just a court case, is it even notable or even just NEWS for it to be included here? Zhanzhao (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)