Talk:WolfSSL

Requested move 11 March 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. Claw of Slime (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

CyaSSL → wolfSSL – Officially renamed since version 3.4.0. Please move Template:Latest stable software release/CyaSSL to Template:Latest stable software release/wolfSSL at the same time. Claw of Slime (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * wolfSSL Embedded SSL Library (formerly CyaSSL)
 * wolfSSL (Formerly CyaSSL) Release 3.4.0 (02/23/2015)

Moved as technical request.[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=650925614] --Claw of Slime (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WolfSSL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130202075746/http://securityinnovation.com/cryptolab/ to http://securityinnovation.com/cryptolab/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Addressing COI
After finding several overtly promotional insertions on pages related to industry standards and comparisons on behalf of this company and product, I have begun a review of the this page. I have already identified significant edits and substantial content here posted by editors working under usernames that match known employees of the company.

In addition, the existing notice that more independent sources and references are needed has been ignored. Of the current 15 footnoted reference links, 9 are links to the company website, 2 are broken links, and 3 are gratuitous links to standard licensing language of open source products in the same industry. Only 1 is a legitimate 3rd party reference.

I believe this page needs significant attention from independent editors to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. Seeing as most of the work on it has been from paid employees, that may pose an issue.

PedanticWithoutACause (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I believe this is significant as WolfSSL is already integrated in OpenWRT and the level of 'blind trust' in this library has only increased. Alexceltare2 (talk) 20:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)